This brief message was written in November of 2015, when the late Mawlānā Taha went to perform ʿumrah. One day, he was seated with a number of ʿulamāʾ in Madīnah, when his conversation with them caught the attention of a student sitting nearby. The student shared his discussion with his peers—a Yemeni student and two Iraqis—who then sought out Mawlānā Taha individually for ijāzah.
As Muslims, especially living as a religious minority, should we be part of the voting process in a secular democratic system? If so, why? If not, why not?
This brief message was penned by Mawlānā Taha in response to a question he received from Toronto, Canada. And although the message was written in 2019, it still holds much academic merit in terms of providing a basic Sharʿī framework for how Muslims living under such circumstances should look at these types of nuanced issues.
Islamic law and juristic ingenuity Of the charges laid at the door of Islamic law in the post-colonial period, that of scholarly sclerosis was probably one of the most common. Juristic ingenuity, it was held, had become ossified to the point where the production of...
In his work, Ghiyath al-Umam, Imām al-Ḥaramayn raises the question of the loss of Muslim political power and posits that the obligation of consolidating and organizing a quasi politico-religious authority rests upon the ʿulāmāʾ.
واجه الإسلام في فترة الاستعمار من المشاكل ما لم يعهد مثله في سالف الأزمنة. وكان من الطبيعي أن يبحثوا في هذه المرحلة الحرجة عن حلول تعالج بها أوضاعهم السياسية والاجتماعية والدينية. كما كان من المحتوم أن تتباين المناهج في ذلك، وتفترق السبل. وللهند من ذلك الحظ الأوفر